SP to decide on strategy in a day,Cong backs Govt on reform
India today test-fired its nuclear-capable strategic missile Agni-IV with a strike range of about 4000 km from a test range off Odisha coast.
It was test launched with the help of a mobile launcher from launch complex-4 of ITR at Wheeler Island, about 100 km from Balasore, at about 1145 hours, defence sources said.
A high performance on-board computer with distributed avionics architecture and high speed reliable communication bus and a full Digital Control System were used to control and guide the missile to the target.
“It is equipped with modern and compact avionics to provide high level of reliability,” a DRDO official said.
“The state-of-the-art Ring Laser Gyros based high accuracy INS (RINS) and Micro Navigation System (MINGS) complementing each other in redundant mode have been incorporated into the missile system in guidance mode,” the sources said.
The sophisticated missile is lighter in weight and has two stages of solid propulsion. The payload, with a re-entry heat shield can withstand temperature of more than 3000 degree Celsius, a defence scientist said.
The missile, is undergoing evelopmental trials by country’s premier Defence Research and Development Organisation.
The last trial of the missile, carried out on November 15, 2011 from the same base was successful.
Posted 1 minute ago by Nksagar
Sep
19
SP to decide on strategy in a day
SP to decide on strategy tomorrow; Left, Right unite for nationwide bandh
Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav today said his party would decide on its strategy on Thursday in the wake of Trinamool Congress withdrawing its support to the UPA government.
“Tomorrow there is a meeting of the Samajwadi Party’s Parliamentary Board. We will take a decision there,” Yadav said while speaking to reporters outside his residence in New Delhi.
The SP chief made clear that his party would go ahead with its plans to hold demonstrations to oppose the decisions taken by the government.
“There will be opposition in Uttar Pradesh and the entire country. The demonstrations in support of people’s issue will happen,” he said.
Yadav also criticised the Government, saying its policies had added to the burden of the common man.
“We want that wisdom should dawn upon the government. What have you (the government) given to the people apart from inflation and corruption. There is so much burden on the common man, so much burden on the farmers,” he added.
Asked if the attitude of the central government was coming in the way of its smooth functioning, he said, “This obstinate attitude, it will only go on to weaken it. Due to this attitude, the Congress party will become very weak”.
However another UPA ally NCP seems to be standing firmly behind the government in its moment of crisis. Party general secretary Tariq Anwar today described Trinamool’s decision as unfortunate.
Meanwhile another UPA ally DMK is meeting in Chennai today to decide its future course of action in the present scenario. Party is also supporting the Bharat Bandh called by opposition parties.
JDU President Sharad Yadav has described the decision to allow FDI in retail as the worst decision against the interest of nation after independence.
CPM Leader Brinda Karat pledged her party’s support for tomorrows Bharat Bandh against FDI in retail and diesel and LPG.
While Congress Spokesperson Rashid Alvi has said that there is no threat to the stability of the UPA Government at the Centre.
Posted 2 minutes ago by Nksagar
Sep
19
Cong backs Govt on reform, directs its State gov to give subsidy till 9 LPG cylinders
Congress party has backed the government on its reform initiatives and directs its State governments to increase the subsidy cap on LPG from Six cylinders to 12 cylinders per year.
Party President Sonia Gandhi today met Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh at his residence along with the other members of party core group.
Party Sources have indicated that government would explain to Trinamool Congress ministers the circumstances under which these decisions were taken.
Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee has sought the total withdrawal of FDI in retail, the slashing of Rs 5 hike in diesel price by Rs 4 or Rs 3 and raise the cap on LPG cylinders from 6 to 12.
After the meeting Congress General Secretary Janardan Dwivedi informed that Congress Chief Sonia Gandhi has asked the congress ruled states to increase the subsidy cap on LPG from Six cylinders to 12 cylinders per year.
There are indications that government will not resort to any major rollback but according to party sources government is open for some symbolic rollback if other allies and parties giving outside support demand so.
All the senior party leaders including prime minister dr Manmohan Singh and Congress president Sonia Gandhi, Finance Minister P Chidambaram, Defence Minister AK Antony attended the meeting.
Six ministers of Trinamool Congress are slated to resign on Friday afternoon if the government does not roll back its decisions.
Railway Minister Mukul Roy said today that nobody from the Government has spoken to him after Mamata Banerjee decided on withdrawing support last night.
Government’s decision to introduce FDI in retail and increasing diesel price as well as capping subsidy on LPG has evoked wide spread opposition from political parties leading to withdrawal of support by Trinamool Congress.
Minutes before the core group meeting began, the Prime Minister held confabulation with deputy chairman of Planning Commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia.
Trinamool Congress on Tuesday decided to withdraw its ministers from the Union government and its support.
The second biggest constituent of the UPA with 19 members in Lok Sabha said the party could reconsider its stand if the government rolls back its decisions on FDI, raised the cap on subsidised LPG from six to 12 cylinders besides reducing diesel hike from Rs 5 by Rs 3 or Rs 4.
Posted 3 minutes ago by Nksagar
Sep
19
Just Foreign Policy News, September 17, 2012
US strikes kill Afghan women; US demands indefinite detention in Afghanistan
Support the Work of Just Foreign Policy
Your support helps us to educate Americans about U.S. foreign policy and create opportunities for Americans to advocate for a foreign pol5cy that is more just.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate
Help your friends sign up to receive the Just Foreign Policy News
Do you know someone who might want to receive the Just Foreign Policy News? You can send them this link:
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/daily-news-signup
Read This Edition of the Just Foreign Policy News on the Web
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/1302
[use this link if you are having formatting issues with the email]
Go Straight to the News Summary in this Email
Switch to the “Short Email” Version of the News
I) Actions and Featured Articles
*Action: Tell President Obama: Free the TPP!
Urge President Obama to release the draft TPP negotiating text and urge your reps. in Congress to press for release of the text. An agreement that could prevent millions from accessing lifesaving medicines should be seen by Congress and the public before it is signed.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/act/obama-free-tpp
Bill Keller: Mitt and Bibi: Diplomacy as Demolition Derby
“Whether you agree or not with the idea of using force to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons (followers of this space know I do not) there is no reason to strike now. There are inspectors and monitoring devices at Iran’s enrichment facilities to alert us if Iran decides to suddenly start enriching weapons-grade fuel. The only urgency is Netanyahu’s calculation that he can use the American presidential election to pressure Obama. That leverage disappears after November 6.”
http://keller.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/12/mitt-and-bibi-diplomacy-as-demolition-derby/
Juan Cole: Top Myths about Iran’s Nuclear Enrichment Program
Has Iran decided to build a nuclear weapon? Not according to Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Israel’s chief of staff, Benny Gantz.
http://www.juancole.com/2012/09/top-myths-about-irans-nuclear-enrichment-program.html
Christian Science Monitor: Imminent Iran nuclear threat? A timeline of warnings since 1979
On Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu conducted a US media offensive to scare Americans about Iran’s nuclear program. Last November, the Christian Science Monitor published a timeline of Israeli warnings about the “imminent threat” of Iran’s nuclear program, going back to 1979.
http://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/print/content/view/print/422252
Summary:
U.S./Top News
1) President Karzai condemned US-led forces for killing eight women in airstrikes on Sunday and denounced the US for continuing to hold hundreds of Afghan prisoners, the New York Times reports.
In the airstrike, US-led forces were apparently unaware that village women sometimes go into the woods in the early hours of the morning to fetch wood for cooking fires they need to have going by breakfast time, the NYT says. On the detention issue, the US wants a guarantee that the Afghans will leave intact the US detention system that allows the indefinite holding of prisoners before handing over remaining prisoners as it previously promised to do, the NYT says.
2) The Obama administration says a judge’s ruling blocking a statute authorizing the indefinite detention of terrorism suspects has jeopardized its ability to continue detaining certain prisoners captured during the war in Afghanistan, the New York Times reports. In an appeal of the ruling, the government asserted that Judge Katherine Forrest went beyond enjoining the statute – enacted last year as part of the NDAA – and potentially curtailed detention powers it has been exercising for years under its interpretation of the 2001 authorization to use military force.
The motion focused on language used by Judge Forrest that rejected interpreting the original use-of-force authorization as including the ability to detain “substantial supporters” of Al Qaeda and the Taliban, as opposed to people who are actually part of those groups. The judge also called into question the idea that the United States could detain members or supporters of “associated forces” that had no involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks.
The US is holding about 50 non-Afghan prisoners, most of them Pakistani, at the Parwan detention facility at Bagram, the NYT notes.
Robert Chesney, a professor at University of Texas, said that if the appeals court upholds the injunction, it could potentially set up a split on detention authority with the more conservative DC appeals court [which has overwhelmingly deferred to the executive and Congress - JFP], and that could force intervention by the Supreme Court [which has been largely content to let the DC appeals court defer to the executive and Congress - JFP.]
3) An Afghan judicial panel ruled Monday that administrative (i.e., indefinite) detention violates Afghan law, AP reports.
4) Nearly three months since Rep. Rush Holt and other members of Congress sent a letter to the president about “signature” drone strikes, the president’s office has not responded, the Lehigh Valley Express-Times reports. “Rep. Holt continues to believe that the concerns that he and his colleagues raised deserve a thorough response from the White House,” a Holt spokesman said. “Targeting an entire group of people on the basis of ambiguous ‘signatures’ is neither precise nor wise, as innocent civilians are too often killed in such strikes,” Holt said in June.
5) Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu told Sunday talks shows that Iran is “six months away from being about 90 percent of having the enriched uranium for an atom bomb,” Thank Progress reports. The reality is that, as Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said last week, it would take Iran at least a year, probably a bit longer, to obtain a bomb once its leaders made the decision to do so, Think Progress notes. A new bipartisan expert report from the Iran Project expounds: “Conservatively, it would take Iran a year or more to build a military-grade weapon, with at least two years or more required to create a nuclear warhead that would be reliably deliverable by a missile.”
6) The significance of the report by The Iran Project saying a military effort to shut down Iran’s nuclear program would involve a multiyear conflict that could engulf the region is not just its analysis but the nearly three dozen respected national security experts from both political parties who signed it: including two former national security advisers, Brent Scowcroft and Zbigniew Brzezinski; former Undersecretary of State Thomas Pickering; and retired Gen. Anthony Zinni, writes the New York Times in an editorial. But Prime Minister Netanyahu is trying to browbeat President Obama into a pre-emptive strike. 70 percent of Americans oppose a unilateral strike on Iran, according to a new poll by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, and 59 percent said if Israel bombs Iran and ignites a war, the US should not come to Israel’s defense, the NYT notes.
Okinawa
7) Tens of thousands rallied Sunday in Okinawa to protest plans to deploy the MV-22 Osprey, the trouble-plagued aircraft, at the Marine base in Ginowan, notes the New York Times in an editorial. Okinawans worry that the plane is prone to crashing. The anger on Sunday reflects frustration over islanders’ long-stymied efforts to get the Marines entirely out of Okinawa, the NYT notes. The US has an obligation to listen to the concerns of the residents, the NYT says. It can start by putting the Ospreys someplace else.
Afghanistan
8) An audacious and complex Taliban attack on a heavily fortified base in southern Afghanistan was a reminder that the Taliban remain capable of serious assaults despite the “surge” offensive against them, the New York Times reports. Two Marines were killed in the attack. Six jets, which each cost between $23 million and $30 million when they were first acquired by the Navy were completely destroyed.
9) An Afghan soldier opened fire on six Lebanese civilian contractors working for U.S.-led forces in southern Afghanistan Sunday night, the Washington Post reports. The attack was the third by rogue Afghan security personnel during the weekend, when foreign six troops were killed. Insider attacks have killed 51 NATO troops so far this year.
Iran
10) Iraq has moved most MEK/PMOI members out of Camp Ashraf, a step that could help pave the way to the group being dropped from a U.S. terrorism blacklist, Reuters reports.
Uruguay
11) Despite a divided public, President Mujica’s proposal to turn the state into the sole supplier of marijuana has a strong chance of passage in Uruguay’s legislature, which the president’s party controls, Bloomberg reports. Nicolas Cotugno, the archbishop of Montevideo, said last year that he would support a move to get the cartels out of the pot business, if that would curb drug use.
Contents:
U.S./Top News
1) Karzai Denounces Coalition Over Airstrikes
Matthew Rosenberg, New York Times, September 16, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/17/world/asia/karzai-denounces-coalition-over-airstrikes.html
Kabul, Afghanistan – Two of the most contentious issues dividing the United States and President Hamid Karzai’s administration re-emerged as the Afghan leader condemned American-led forces for killing eight women in airstrikes on Sunday and denounced his American allies for continuing to hold hundreds of Afghan prisoners.
After the coalition initially said that it needed time to investigate Afghan reports of the deaths, by evening it confirmed that the civilians had died in airstrikes launched early Sunday in the mountains of eastern Afghanistan. It said the strikes were carried out “solely with the intent of countering known insurgents,” and offered its sympathies to the families of those slain. It did not give a number of dead; Afghan officials said eight women who were out collecting firewood had died.
While Mr. Karzai’s condemnation was likely to rankle some Western officials, it was in keeping with how he has responded to the killing of Afghan bystanders by both coalition forces and the Taliban, which is responsible for the vast majority of civilian deaths in Afghanistan. Instead, the presidential palace reserved its strongest language for the continued detention of some 600 Afghans at what was once the main American prison here. Mr. Karzai’s office said in a statement that keeping the prisoners was a “serious breach” and a “serious violation” of a deal struck this year, under which the United States agreed to transfer control of the prison to Afghan authorities on Sept. 9.
“The continued holding of Afghans in American custody runs in contradiction with the spirit of mutual friendship,” it said. “The people of Afghanistan consider the issue of prisons and detention of their fellow citizens a matter of their national sovereignty.”
After a summer in which American and Afghan officials were more often than not on the same page, the confrontational tone of the statement was a sharp reminder of the acrimony that has often characterized relations between Mr. Karzai and his American benefactors. As recently as March, Mr. Karzai referred to Americans as “demons.”
The statement came after Mr. Karzai met with Ambassador Marc Grossman, the United States special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, who was in Kabul on a previously unannounced visit. The men discussed the prison issue and stalled efforts to strike a peace deal with the Taliban, the palace said.
The Americans were holding roughly 3,000 people at the prison, which is next to Bagram Air Base north of Kabul, when the United States and Afghanistan signed a memorandum of understanding in March that laid out a six-month timetable for the transfer. But Afghan officials say 600 people detained since March remain in American custody, along with about 30 of the original prisoners considered too dangerous to release but too difficult to prosecute because of a lack of admissible evidence.
American officials have not said anything about the 600 figure, but they have acknowledged holding the men detained before the deal was struck. They also have said they want the Afghans to agree to detain those men indefinitely under stipulations in the Geneva Convention that permit wartime detentions without trial.
[...]
Rangin Dadfar Spanta, Afghanistan’s national security adviser, said in an interview last week that the Afghan government would eventually implement such a system but wanted control of the prisoners immediately. The Americans want a guarantee that the Afghans will leave intact the American detention system that allows the indefinite holding of prisoners deemed dangerous if there is insufficient evidence to try them.
[...]
The airstrikes took place in the Alingar district of Laghman Province. The coalition said the strikes were called in around 2 a.m. during a firefight with insurgents that had been spotted moving through the area.
According to Maj. Lori Hodge of the Air Force, coalition forces “engaged with precision munitions and direct fire” – airstrikes and gunfire – with about 45 insurgents. She could not say how many insurgents were killed.
Coalition forces were apparently unaware that village women sometimes go into the woods in the early hours of the morning to fetch wood for cooking fires they need to have going by breakfast time.
2) U.S. Warns Ruling Impedes Its Detention Powers
Charlie Savage, New York Times, September 17, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/18/us/politics/us-warns-judges-ruling-impedes-its-detention-powers.html
Washington – The Obama administration warned Monday that a judge’s ruling last week blocking a statute authorizing the indefinite detention of terrorism suspects has jeopardized its ability to continue detaining certain prisoners captured during the war in Afghanistan.
In an emergency appeal of the ruling, the government asserted that United States District Court Judge Katherine B. Forrest went beyond enjoining the statute – enacted last year as part of the National Defense Authorization Act – and potentially curtailed detention powers it has been exercising for years under its interpretation of the authorization to use military force against the perpetrators of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Judge Forrest’s order “threatens irreparable harm to national security and the public interest by injecting added burdens and dangerous confusion into the conduct of military operations abroad during an active armed conflict,” the government wrote in a 38-page filing with the federal appeals court in New York.
The motion focused on language used by Judge Forrest that rejected interpreting the original use-of-force authorization as including the ability to detain “substantial supporters” of Al Qaeda and the Taliban, as opposed to people who are actually part of those groups. The judge also called into question the idea that the United States could detain members or supporters of “associated forces” that had no involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks.
“If, following issuance of this permanent injunctive relief, the government detains individuals under theories of ‘substantially or directly supporting’ associated forces, as set forth in” the National Defense Authorization Act, “and a contempt action is brought before this court, the government will bear a heavy burden indeed,” she wrote.
The United States is holding about 50 non-Afghan prisoners, most of them Pakistani, at the Parwan detention facility at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, as well several hundred Afghans. The legal imbroglio comes during a diplomatic tussle with the government of President Hamid Karzai over control of the Afghan prisoners.
The indefinite detention provision in the version of the annual National Defense Authorization Act enacted last year was contentious because lawmakers did not make clear whether American citizens could also be held without trial as wartime prisoners, and they did not specify what kinds of conduct constituted the “support” that could make someone detainable, nor which “associated forces” were off-limits.
Judge Forrest raised the question of how to interpret the original Authorization for Use of Military Force, or AUMF, passed by Congress in 2001 because the government argued that the National Defense Authorization Act did not expand the scope of its detention authority. But she disagreed, saying that the government’s interpretation went beyond the text of the 2001 authorization.
The 2001 authorization and the new statute, she wrote, “are not the same; they are not co-extensive. Military detention based on allegations of ‘substantially supporting’ or ‘directly supporting’ the Taliban, Al Qaeda, or associated forces, is not encompassed within the AUMF and is enjoined by this order regarding the National Defense Authorization Act.”
[...]
The executive branch has long relied upon the authorization to use military force against the perpetrators of the Sept. 11 attacks, and those who harbored them, as the basis for its ability to detain people. It has applied judicial rulings about the scope of that authority from habeas corpus cases brought by detainees at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to its detention operations in Afghanistan, where courts do not have jurisdiction.
Last year, Congress wrote a new statute codifying a definition of the scope of detention authority derived from the Guantánamo litigation. It said the United States could detain not only members of Al Qaeda and the Taliban, but also their substantial supporters as well as associated forces engaged in hostilities against the United States and its allies.
In issuing its ruling rejecting some of those categories, the administration said, the district court “has taken it upon itself to disagree with an interpretation of the military’s detention authority that had previously been endorsed by all three branches of government. What is more, the district court expressly invites actions for contempt sanctions if the military exercises detention authority in a manner inconsistent with the court’s deeply flawed understanding of that authority.”
Judge Forrest had previously issued a preliminary injunction against enforcing the statute. While the government had appealed, it did not seek a stay of her preliminary order, which lacked the more expansive language.
But after she made the injunction permanent last week, the Obama administration immediately asked her for an emergency stay, arguing that she was making an “unprecedented” judicial intrusion into wartime matters. When she declined, the government signaled it would go straight to the appeals court.
Robert Chesney, a professor at University of Texas, Austin, who specializes in the laws of war, said that if the Second Circuit appeals court upholds the injunction – even if by narrowing its scope – rather than overturning it on standing grounds, it could potentially set up a split on detention authority with the more conservative District of Columbia appeals court.
That outcome could persuade the Supreme Court to intervene again on detention matters, something he said executive branch officials “don’t want at this point because they can’t do any better than they’ve done” with the District of Columbia circuit.
[...]
3) Afghan judicial panel rules US-favored administrative detention is against Afghan law
Associated Press, Monday, September 17, 3:21 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/afghan-judicial-panel-rules-us-favored-administrative-detention-is-against-afghan-law/2012/09/17/76a8b79c-00ee-11e2-bbf0-e33b4ee2f0e8_story.html
Kabul, Afghanistan – An Afghan judicial panel ruled Monday that administrative detention violates Afghan law, potentially thwarting a U.S. plan to hand over Afghan detainees that American officials believe should continue to be held without a trial.
President Hamid Karzai’s office announced in a statement that a top-level judicial panel met earlier in the day and decided that the detention of Afghan citizens without a court trial “has not been foreseen in Afghan laws” and therefore could not be used.
The U.S. government has long held Afghans captured in operations inside the country without trial, arguing that they are enemy combatants and therefore can be detained for as long as their release might pose a danger to the international coalition.
Afghan laws have come into play only since the signing of a deal in March in which the U.S. agreed it would hand over all Afghan citizens to the Afghan government – acceding to a key Karzai demand to pave the way for a pact allowing for the long-term presence of U.S. forces in the country.
[...]
4) U.S. Rep. Rush Holt still has not received White House response from military drone letter
Phillip Molnar, The Express-Times, Monday, September 17, 2012, 6:01 AM http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/hunterdon-county/express-times/index.ssf/2012/09/us_rep_rush_holt_still_has_not.html
Rep. Rush Holt wants President Barack Obama to check his mailbox.
Nearly three months since Holt, D-Hunterdon, and 26 other members of Congress sent a letter to the president about the use of military drone strikes, the president’s office has not responded.
“Rep. Holt continues to believe that the concerns that he and his colleagues raised deserve a thorough response from the White House,” Holt spokesman Thomas Seay said last week.
[...]
The letter, signed by 24 Democrats and two Republicans, cited an article by The Washington Post that claimed the president had given increased authority for a drone campaign in Yemen.
According to the article, American forces would be permitted to fire on suspected terrorists even when the identity of those killed would not be known.
The Post reported the forces could fire on targets based on intelligence “signatures” — patterns of behavior that are detected through signal intercepts, human sources and aerial surveillance — and that indicated the presence of an important operative or plot against U.S. interests.
“Targeting an entire group of people on the basis of ambiguous ‘signatures’ is neither precise nor wise, as innocent civilians are too often killed in such strikes,” Holt told The Express-Times in June.
The letter was signed by Dennis Kucinich, Ron Paul, Charles Rangel and others.
[...]
The letter asked for an explanation of “signature” strikes and ways forces could ensure drone killings are legal and what follow-up is done after a civilian is killed.
[...]
Since May 2011, the London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism has recorded up to 116 U.S. drone strikes in Yemen but only 39 have been confirmed by officials. The nonprofit claimed 60 to 163 civilians had been killed in Yemen by U.S. covert action since 2001.
5) Misinformation On Iran’s Nuclear Program Pervades Sunday Talk Shows
By Ben Armbruster on Sep 17, 2012 at 2:42 pm
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/09/17/858531/sunday-shows-misinformation-iran/
[...]
Similarly, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – who repeatedly referred to Iran having a “nuclear weapons program” (U.S. and Israeli intelligence and the IAEA do not believe Iran has made the decision to go that far) – appeared to be trying to rev up fears about a potential Iranian nuclear weapon, saying on NBC’s Meet the Press:
NETANYAHU: I think that as they get closer and closer and closer to the achievement of the weapons-grade material, and they’re very close, they’re six months away from being about 90 percent of having the enriched uranium for an atom bomb.
It’s unclear what Netanyahu is saying Iran is six months away from exactly. But whatever he meant, the reality is that, as Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said last week, it would take Iran at least a year, probably a bit longer, to obtain a bomb once its leaders made the decision to do so. A new bipartisan expert report from the Iran Project expounds: “Conservatively, it would take Iran a year or more to build a military-grade weapon, with at least two years or more required to create a nuclear warhead that would be reliably deliverable by a missile.”
One key point on Iran’s timeline for building a bomb is that the U.S. and its allies would most likely know when the clock starts ticking. As Panetta said last week, “We have pretty good intelligence on them. We know generally what they’re up to. And so we keep a close track on them.”
Yet the Sunday show pundits got this all wrong as well. “President Obama said our intelligence service will give us a pretty long lead time in understanding where Iran is,” George Will said on ABC’s This Week, adding, “I think he may have a faith in the ability of our intelligence services to draw lines and put down markers as to where the Iranian program is that we simply actually don’t have.”
And on Meet the Press, Bod Woodward and Andrea Mitchell echoed Mr. Will:
MITCHELL: [Obama administration officials] believe somehow in this notion that they will have the intelligence, they will know when the Ayatollah makes a political decision, and they will still have the time. And arguably in the past, we’ve learned that intelligence is not that precise. [...]
WOODWARD: If you study intelligence, as I have for about 40 years, and Jeffrey and I were talking about, some day we’re going to write a book called “The Unintelligence of Intelligence” because it’s just often wrong.
Again, here’s what the Iran Project’s report has to say on this issue:
‘Iran today is probably the most “watched” country in the world – not just by the United States and the IAEA, but by other nations as well. To carry out a secret, parallel nuclear weapons program, Iran would need to divert both safeguarded material and some of the country’s relatively small network of well-qualified experts in centrifuge enrichment; such diversions would almost certainly be detected. While there are differences of opinion on this issue, we believe it would be extremely difficult for Iran to hide a nuclear program devoted to weapons development. No monitoring and detection system is failure-proof, but Iran has little reason to be confident that it could get away with creating a secret program to produce fissile material for a weapon.’
[...]
6) No Rush to War
Editorial, New York Times, September 14, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/15/opinion/no-rush-to-war.html
Amid the alarming violence in the Arab world, a new report about the costs of a potential war with Iran got lost this week. It says an attack by the United States could set back Iran’s nuclear program four years at most, while a more ambitious goal – ensuring Iran never reconstitutes its nuclear program or ousting the regime – would involve a multiyear conflict that could engulf the region.
The significance of the report by The Iran Project is not just its sober analysis but the nearly three dozen respected national security experts from both political parties who signed it: including two former national security advisers, Brent Scowcroft and Zbigniew Brzezinski; former Undersecretary of State Thomas Pickering; and the retired Gen. Anthony Zinni.
Yet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel is trying to browbeat President Obama into a pre-emptive strike. On Tuesday, he demanded that the United States set a red line for military action and said those who refuse “don’t have a moral right to place a red light before Israel.” Later, Mr. Obama telephoned him and rejected the appeal. On Friday, Mr. Netanyahu suggested in an interview that Israel cannot entirely rely on the United States to act against Iran’s program.
Leaders need flexibility and ambiguity, not just hard and fast red lines. And it is dangerous for Mr. Netanyahu to try to push the president into a corner publicly and raise questions about Washington. Is that really the message he wants to send to Tehran?
There is no reason to doubt President Obama’s oft-repeated commitment to keep Iran from having a nuclear weapon. But 70 percent of Americans oppose a unilateral strike on Iran, according to a new poll by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, and 59 percent said if Israel bombs Iran and ignites a war, the United States should not come to its ally’s defense.
[...]
Okinawa
7) Ospreys in Okinawa
Editorial, New York Times, September 14, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/15/opinion/ospreys-in-okinawa.html
Tens of thousands of people rallied on Sunday in Okinawa to protest plans to deploy the MV-22 Osprey, the trouble-plagued tilt-rotor aircraft, at the United States Marine Corps base in the city of Ginowan. The Marines want to bring in 24 Ospreys to replace a fleet of Vietnam-era helicopters, but Okinawans, turning out in one of the largest anti-American protests in years, are bristling.
The Osprey has a terrible reputation as a prime example of a hugely expensive, dubiously useful weapons systems. Okinawans don’t care about the misspent money. They worry that the plane is prone to crashing. To many residents, who have borne the heavy burden of the American military presence in Japan, deploying the Osprey on the island is rubbing salt into an old wound.
The first dozen Ospreys to reach Japan have been grounded while the Japanese government reviews the plane’s safety record. Marine officials insist that the Osprey’s notorious defects have been worked out and that it is safe and reliable. But, in April, an Osprey crashed in Morocco, killing two Marines. Another crashed in Florida in June. Though officials blame pilot error for the accidents, that has hardly eased local fears in densely crowded Okinawa, which has seen hundreds of crashes and emergency landings of military jets and helicopters since the 1950s, several of them fatal.
The anger on Sunday was not just about two dozen planes. It reflects frustration over islanders’ long-stymied efforts to get the Marines entirely out of Okinawa. Japan and the United States struck a deal in 2006 to close Futenma, move several thousand Marines off the island and shift others to a new base on Okinawa’s less-populated northeast coast. But many Okinawans saw this agreement as inadequate, and it went nowhere. A deal reached in April to move 9,000 Marines has also been stalled.
For too long, Okinawans have seen promises but no movement. The United States has an obligation to tread lightly in Okinawa and to listen to the concerns of the residents. It can start by putting the Ospreys someplace else.
Afghanistan
8) Audacious Raid on NATO Base Shows Taliban’s Reach
Alissa J. Rubin, New York Times, September 16, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/17/world/asia/green-on-blue-attacks-in-afghanistan-continue.html
Kabul, Afghanistan – An audacious Taliban attack on a heavily fortified base in southern Afghanistan did far more damage than initially reported, destroying or severely damaging eight attack jets in the most destructive single strike on Western matériel in the 11-year war, military officials said Sunday.
While other attacks have caused greater loss of life, the assault late Friday at Camp Bastion in Helmand Province, one of the largest and best-defended posts in Afghanistan, was troubling to NATO because the attackers were able to penetrate the base, killing two Marines and causing more than $200 million in damage. “We’re saying it’s a very sophisticated attack,” said a military official here. “We’ve lost aircraft in battle, but nothing like this.”
The complex attack, which NATO officials said was conducted by three tightly choreographed teams of militants wearing American Army uniforms, was a reminder that the Taliban remain capable of serious assaults despite the “surge” offensive against them. Now the offensive is over, and nearly 10,000 American Marines have left Helmand Province, a critical stronghold for the Taliban, over the past several months.
[...]
The 15 insurgents conducting the attack lost no time from the moment they blew a hole in the perimeter at one of the closest points to the airfield, military officials said. They then raced toward their targets, shooting and setting fire to parked Marine AV-8B Harrier jets and destroying three refueling stations, even as a quick reaction force was mustering to fight them off, a military official said. “It was a running gun battle for a while, two and a half hours, nonetheless they were able to get to the aircraft before we could intercept them,” a military official said, noting that because it happened at night it was difficult until daylight to be sure that all the insurgents had been killed or captured. All but one was killed; the remaining insurgent is in custody, the military said.
Two American Marines were killed in the attack, and nine coalition personnel, including a civilian contractor, were wounded, the military said in a statement. Prince Harry, the third in line to the British throne, is doing a tour of duty as a helicopter pilot and was stationed at Camp Bastion at the time of the attack, but was not hurt. Camp Bastion is home mostly to British soldiers, while the neighboring camp, known as Leatherneck, has American Marines and other service members.
Six of the jets, which each cost between $23 million and $30 million when they were first acquired by the United States Navy, according to a General Accounting Office report, were completely destroyed and two more were so severely damaged it was unlikely they could be repaired. Also badly damaged were three refueling stations and three soft-skinned aircraft hangars, the military said in a news release.
Determining how it was possible for the insurgents to penetrate and severely damage such a well-defended base, particularly one with clear lines of sight across miles of mostly flat plain, will be important in determining whether this was a unique attack or one that could be replicated either in targeting Western bases or Afghan ones, military experts said.
“The Taliban retain the command and military planning infrastructure to put together complex and sophisticated attacks,” said Stephen Biddle, a professor at George Washington University with expertise in defense studies.
[...]
This year’s toll from what are known as insider or green-on-blue attacks – green being American military parlance for indigenous forces, blue for its own – has become one of the most visible signs of the challenges faced by the NATO-led coalition as it nears the end of its role in Afghanistan’s war.
The second attack of the weekend, which was Sunday in Zabul Province, was the deadlier of the two latest incidents, with four coalition service members killed. The coalition said in a terse statement that the attack was “suspected to involve members of the Afghan police” and was under investigation.
[...]
The six deaths brought to 51 the number of coalition service members killed this year in insider attacks. The toll has already well exceeded last year’s total of 35 killed in such violence.
9) Afghan soldier wounds foreign contractors; mob tries to storm U.S. base in Kabul
Sayed Salahuddin and Richard Leiby, Washington Post, September 17, 1:35 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/afghan-shooter-wounds-foreign-contractor-police-attacked-in-violent-protests-in-kabul/2012/09/17/b18aef14-00c7-11e2-bbf0-e33b4ee2f0e8_story.html
Kabul – An Afghan soldier opened fire on six Lebanese civilian contractors working for U.S.-led NATO forces in southern Afghanistan on Sunday night, causing minor injuries, coalition officials said Monday. The attack was the third by rogue Afghan security personnel during the weekend, when foreign six troops were killed.
The member of the Afghan National Army fired shots at six contractors riding in a vehicle near Camp Garmsir, a shared base in southern Helmand province, said Lt. Col. Hagen Messer, a coalition spokesman. Some of them were wounded, but Messer said he could not provide a specific number.
Another Afghan soldier disarmed the attacker and took him into custody, Messer said, adding that the assailant thought he was targeting foreign troops.
Over the weekend, six international troops – four Americans and two British – died after Afghan forces opened fire on them, the latest deaths in a spate of so-called insider attacks that have killed 51 NATO troops so far this year.
In Kabul, meanwhile, about 500 Afghan demonstrators attacked police with stones and sticks Monday while trying to storm a U.S. military base in the capital, authorities said. It was the first violent anti-American protest in Afghanistan over a video that Muslims worldwide have condemned as blasphemous.
Fifteen police were wounded, none seriously, Interior Ministry spokesman Mohammad Najib said. The protesters also destroyed a police vehicle and torched a police post, he said.
Some demonstrators said they turned against the police after being prevented from breaching the main gate and walls surrounding Camp Phoenix, a U.S. Army base in the eastern part of the capital.
“We wanted to attack Camp Phoenix to kill the Americans but were stopped by the Afghan police, and we had to attack the police,” said protester Ajmal Hotak, a 26-year-old shopkeeper.
Chanting “Death to all infidel countries,” the demonstrators demanded punishment for those who made the anti-Muslim film. They also called for the immediate withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan.
[...]
Iran
10) Most Iranian dissidents moved from Iraq camp
Reuters, Sun, Sep 16 2012
http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/09/16/iraq-iran-dissidents-idINDEE88F07M20120916
Baghdad – Iraq has moved most Iranian dissidents out of a camp they have lived in for decades to a former U.S. military base in Baghdad, officials said on Sunday, a step that could help pave the way to the group being dropped from a U.S. terrorism blacklist.
Iraqi and U.S. officials said that about 680 members of the People’s Mujahideen Organisation of Iran (PMOI) were transferred from Camp Ashraf to Camp Hurriya on Sunday, representing the last major relocation of members of the group and ending a standoff.
“Of the 3,280 residents originally in Camp Ashraf, only a small group now remains on a temporary basis to arrange the details pursuant to the closure of the camp,” said Martin Kobler, special representative of the U.N. Secretary-General in Iraq.
[...]
Uruguay
11) Uruguay Sees Green in Plans for a State-Run Marijuana Monopoly
Lucia Baldomir and Eric Martin, Bloomberg, Sep 13, 2012 4:00 PM CT
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-13/uruguay-sees-green-in-plans-for-a-state-run-marijuana-monopoly.html
For decades, Uruguay has been best known for the tranquil beaches of Punta del Este and picturesque Colonia, a 17th century town on the Rio de la Plata. One of South America’s smallest nations, it may soon have another claim to relative fame as home to the world’s first government-run marijuana market.
Leaders in Mexico, Colombia, and other Latin American nations wracked by cartel violence are calling for a new approach in the U.S.-led war on drugs. Uruguay President Jose Mujica’s solution is to not just legalize pot but turn the state into the sole supplier, replacing dealers who often engage in turf wars as they move $30 million to $40 million of the drug illegally each year, according to Uruguayan government estimates.
Despite a divided public, the proposal has a strong chance of passage in Uruguay’s legislature, which the president’s party controls, Bloomberg Businessweek reports in its Sept. 17 issue. State involvement would “spoil the market” for pot dealers, “because we will sell it a lot cheaper than what they’re selling it for on the black market,” Mujica, 77, told CNN last month.
Marijuana possession for personal use has already been decriminalized in Uruguay, although distribution remains illegal. Under Mujica’s proposal, Uruguayans older than 18 would be able to register for a monthly pot ration of up to 30 grams (1.06 ounces), though sales to foreigners would remain prohibited.
Sales would be taxed, with proceeds funding treatment for addicts of harder drugs. The government estimates there are about 150,000 marijuana users in Uruguay and that it, or a private contractor, would have to plant 150 to 200 hectares (370 to 490 acres) to meet demand.
[...]
Mujica began campaigning for the law in July, when crime was spiking, but he has yet to see results. In a recent survey by private pollster Cifra, 66 percent of respondents opposed legalizing pot sales.
The president has said he will bow to public opinion, but Secretary of the Presidency Alberto Breccia said in July that a new survey must be conducted once the full legislative language of the proposal is finalized and publicly available. “If I had to bet money, I’d say some version of this will pass, but it’s not a sure thing,” says Adam Isacson, an analyst at the Washington Office on Latin America, a human rights and social justice advocacy group.
Among the converts is Nicolas Cotugno, the archbishop of Montevideo, who said last year that he would support a move to get the cartels out of the pot business, if that would curb drug use.
[...]
Posted 5 minutes ago by Nksagar
Sep
19
Description: GBO Newsletter
Description: http://admin/gbo/newsletter/images/spacer2012.jpg
Description: http://admin/gbo/newsletter/images/fb_icon12.jpg
Description: http://admin/gbo/newsletter/images/tw_icon12.jpg
Description: http://admin/gbo/newsletter/images/in_icon12.jpg
18 September 2012 | Edition:111
Greetings
Dear friends,
Another Tuesday and here we are with a newsletter fresh and full of news, information and announcements. To begin with, we have our event highlights as planned for the Frankfurt Book Fair. So, we are ready with our two Matchmaking events and – one for the Printers and another for the STM Publishers. We are focusing on outing together targeted events for both these important groups for the first time and hope that you find it of interest as well. If so, please email us on what you think of such events and what would you like us to focus on in the future. Also, for these two matcmakings here, feel free to email us and register for them. And as you do that, there is also the very interesting FICCI Business Lunch for which entry is open as well and you can also get a better idea of the programme in the corresponding article.
What is exciting on top of this, is that we are offering an additional 20% waiver on the actual price of registering for the Frankfurt Academy events at the Frankfurt Book Fair – if you register through us. All you’ve to do is email us and we will send you the unique code for this special price as you go forward. So don’t wait for too long as it is drawing close and it is time now to pack your bags and make the trip to Frankfurt!
Wishing you a very good week ahead.
Kind regards
The German Book Office New Delhi Team
Description: http://admin/gbo/images/intro_default.jpg
Description: http://admin/gbo/newsletter/images/title_tag.jpg
Matchmaking Events at Frankfurt Book Fair 2012
While we eagerly wait for the day the Frankfurt Book Fair 2012 actually starts, we are looking forward to days full of activities and interactions, keeping in view the events that are happening including the ones we have planned for. Fuelled by one of our aims to facilitate business through targeted networking, we are organizing two Matchmaking sessions- one for the STM Publishers and the other for publishing companies interested in meeting Printers which is being organized by Khublei in cooperation with the GBO. Through these we wish to address the business interests and needs of the specific groups in question which are integral to the publishing industry. We hope that you will find them unique and relevant, even as we’ve envisaged them to be filling in some of the existing gaps in niche networking opportunities.
Once again, we’d like to bring to your notice that these are events to which registrations are open until the few available seats are there. And in order to register for the STM Publishers’ Matchmaking, please email srivastava@newdelhi.gbo.org with details of your stand, company name, name and designation of representative and five lines (not exceeding) of company profile with website link. While, for the Printers Matchmaking, send your email to khublei.2012@gmail.com with subject: ‘Matchmaking FBF 2012’ [with name of person attending and short company profile and website].
The specific details of the events are:
Matchmaking – Indian and International STM Publishers
Date: Friday, 12 October
Time: 14.00-16.00 pm
Language: English
Venue: Hall 4C, Room Concorde
Participation fee: 25 euros [Rs 2000 in INR equivalent]
This is an opportunity for the Indian STM publishers to meet their international counterparts and vice versa in their bid to explore business opportunities together. We are inviting registrations from the Indian STM publishers interested in trading rights with international publishers and looking to sell their titles to institutional buyers. We are also looking forward to welcoming the international publishers, distributors and librarians interested in meeting Indian STM/academic publishers to register for this session which brings them in contact directly with the players in the burgeoning Indian STM market.
Entry: By prior registration only [for only one person per organisation]
To register for the STM Publishers’ Matchmaking, please email srivastava@newdelhi.gbo.org
Matchmaking – Indian Printers
Date: Friday, 12 October
Time: 16.00-17.00 pm
Language: English
Venue: Hall 8 S 989
Organizer: Indian Printers Collective & KHUBLEI with FBM/GBO support
As the Printers Collective exhibits for the first time at the Frankfurt Book Fair, such an event is poised to make their presence further noticed. We are glad to invite all those interested in meeting the Top 10 Indian printers at the Printers’ Collective stand for organised one-on-one meetings between the printers and potential business partners from across the globe.
Entry: By prior registration only [for only one person per organisation]. To register for the for the Printers Matchmaking, send your email to khublei.2012@gmail.com
Participating Printers:
Gopsons Papers Ltd. – www.gopsons.com
International Print-o-Pac Limited – www.ippindia.com
Jayant Printery – www.jayantprintery.com
Manipal Technologies Ltd. – www.manipaltechnologies.com
Multivista Global Ltd. – www.multivistaglobal.com
Nutech Print Services – www.nutechprint.com
Parksons Graphics – www.parksonsgraphics.com
Replika Press (Pvt.) Ltd. – www.replikapress.com
Repro India Limited – www.reproindialtd.com
Thomson Press (India) Ltd. – www.thomsonpress.com
Description: http://admin/gbo/newsletter/images/title_tag.jpg
FICCI presents: India – The Opportune Moment
A business Lunch during the Frankfurt Book Fair
The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) will bring together experts from the Indian publishing industry to talk about the publishing ecosystem and markets in India- an area which still engenders curiosity.
India – The Opportune Moment
A business Lunch
Date: Friday, 12 October
Time: 12.30 – 14.00 pm
Language: English
Venue: Hall 4C, Room Entente
Entry: By prior registration only
Organizer: FICCI (with FBM/GBO support)
Programme
Welcome: Mr. Sumeet Gupta, Director, FICCI
Introduction: Ms. Urvashi Butalia, Chairperson, FICCI Publishing Committee and Director, Zubaan
Description: http://admin/gbo/images/siteimages/Ficci_Speakers.jpg
Presentations :
Market for higher education books in India
Presented by: Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Co- Chair, FICCI Publishing Committee and Joint Mg Director, S Chand Group
Trade market in India
Presented by: Mr. Ananth Padmanabhan, Vice President, Penguin India
Market for e books within and outside India
Presented by: Mr. Kailash Balani, Mg Director, Balani Infotech:
Market for rights in India and selling Indian rights outside of India
Presented by: Ms. Karthika V, Harper Collins India
Moderated by: Ms. Urvashi Butalia, Chairperson, FICCI Publishing Committee and Director, Zubaan
Following people will be present as part of a panel to take questions on a range of subjects including issues of copyright, piracy, FDI and suchlike:
Mr. Manas Saikia, Mg Director, Cambridge University Press
Mr. Anand Bhushan, Mg. Director, Pitambar Publication
Mr. Rohit Kumar, Mg Director, Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd.
Mr. Paul Vinay Kumar, Publisher, Westland India Pvt. Ltd
Mr. Krishnadev Rao, Director, Orient Blackswan Pvt. Ltd.
Mr. Anil Goteti, Director, eBooks, Flipkart
Description: http://admin/gbo/newsletter/images/title_tag.jpg
Register now for the Frankfurt Academy Conferences through the GBO!
With its extensive programme of conferences, workshops, training courses, and specialist and networking events, the Frankfurt Academy provides you with guidance as well as opportunities for discourse. Drawing on an international network of media experts and partners, it addresses practically every aspect of creating and exploiting content. Register now for the Frankfurt Academy Conferences through the GBO info@newdelhi.gbo.org and receive a 20% discount on the following events:
Monday, 8 October 2012
Publishers Launch Conference
10.30 am – 6.30 pm
Room Dimension, Hall 4.2
Publishers Launch, the trade publishing strategy and tactics conference aimed at consumer publishing executives, agents, retailers – and those who wish to do business with them – is the can’t-miss stop for an international trade or digital executive at the Frankfurt Book Fair 2012.
Sessions will be organised by two central themes: innovating CEOs and global e-publishing strategies and data.
www.book-fair.com/launch
Tuesday, 9 October 2012
TOC Tools of Change Conference Frankfurt
From Transition to Transformation — The New Publishing Ecosystem
8.30 am – 6 pm
Frankfurt Marriott Hotel, Hamburger Allee 2
Tools of Change Frankfurt returns for a fourth year on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 — the eve of the Frankfurt Book Fair (10-14 October) — gathering the best and brightest in our global publishing and technology community for a full day of intriguing keynotes, sessions, and networking.
More than 30 sessions will cover not only the latest debates on e-book standards, pricing, metadata, and supply chain innovations, but will also feature cutting edge presentations from visionary speakers
www.book-fair.com/toc
26th International Rights Directors Meeting
Is Big always beautiful? Review your rights strategy in times of change!
2 – 5 pm
Frankfurt Book Fair, Room Europa, Hall 4.0
Are large markets always the most productive and smaller ones just a hassle? Rights departments often tend to concentrate on approaching the big book markets, expecting correspondingly large revenues for the company and the authors. This year’s Rights Directors Meeting will look at China as a market giant and check perspectives and risks. A number of smaller markets will be evaluated for their perspectives as well, including digital. Be prepared for some surprise stories – some from where you least expected them.
www.book-fair.com/rights-meeting
Thursday, 11 October, and Friday, 12 October 2012
Frankfurt StoryDrive Conference
Frankfurt Book Fair, Room Europa, Hall 4.0
Frankfurt StoryDrive’s two-day conference programme will explore the media business of tomorrow under the motto “Maximise your story, maximise your business”. It will highlight the potential for crossmedia collaboration and provide exclusive insights into international success stories. The StoryDrive project marketplace also offers organised matchmaking sessions with potential business partners from the publishing, film and games industries.
www.book-fair.com/storydrive
The Frankfurt Academy Programme of Intensive Trainings
(all events are held in room Entente, Hall 4.C, information and registration: www.book-fair.com/fap)
Wednesday, 10 October 2012
9.15 am – 12.00 pm
Rights Express – Learn about rights from the experts
In this compact seminar, rights professional Lynette Owen, Pearson Education Ltd, will provide a comprehensive overview of the tools you need to succeed in the rights and licensing business. To complement the seminar, media attorneys will take questions from the audience in an open consultation round. Participants are invited to a Business Lunch hosted by Copyright Clearance Center (12.30 – 1.30 pm).
2.30 pm – 5.30 pm
Generation crossover: Trends in the children’s and YA book market
Junko Yokota from the Center for Teaching Through Children’s Books will offer exclusive insights into the children’s and YA book market. In addition to highlighting current and future trends, the seminar will also focus on the unique characteristics and needs of an audience of “digital natives”.
Thursday, 11 October 2012
9.30 am – 12.30 pm
TOC Frankfurt Metadata Workshop
Up-to-date, practical knowledge on the subject of metadata. Laura Dawson, Bowker, and Brian O’Leary, Magellan Media, will provide an overview of the latest trends and tools available. They’ll also clearly explain how consistently maintaining metadata can lead to more sales – and thus increased revenues.
2.30 pm – 5.30 pm
HTML5 & EPUB 3 for advanced learners: The next level for e-books
Markus Gylling, International Digital Publishing Forum (IDPF), and Luc Audrain, Hachette Livre, will demonstrate the functionality and potential of EPUB 3 and HTML5 – and show you how to take your e-books to the next level.
Friday, 12 October 2012
9.30 am – 12.30 pm
Limited budget, big impact: Marketing for publishers
Social media or guerrilla marketing? PR campaign or 360-degree? International experts like Amelia Fairney, Penguin General, and Dr. Silke Borgstedt, SINUS Markt- und Sozialforschung, will share their extensive practical knowledge of creative marketing concepts and creating a tailored plan of action.
2.30 pm – 5.30 pm
The best of both worlds: Publishing meets merchandising
Emma Cairns-Smith, Egmont, and Olivier d’Agay, Saint Exupéry-d’Agay Estate, will present international success stories and clearly explain the do’s and don’ts of the merchandising business.
Description: http://admin/gbo/images/siteimages/low-1-Group-at-Kulturbrauerei.jpg
Description: http://admin/gbo/images/siteimages/low-2-AVI_4152.jpg
Description: http://admin/gbo/images/siteimages/low-3-03_DSC03196.jpg
Description: http://admin/gbo/images/siteimages/low-4-_MG_0965.jpg
Description: http://admin/gbo/images/siteimages/low-5-_MG_0899.jpg
Description: http://admin/gbo/images/siteimages/low-6-_HAR7738.jpg
German Book Office New Delhi
4/9 Shanti Niketan | GF, Back Unit | New Delhi 110021 | India
t +91 11 40201100
f +91 11 40201107
e info@newdelhi.gbo.org
www.newdelhi.gbo.org
German Book Office New Delhi is a joint venture between the Frankfurt Book Fair and the Federal Foreign Office, Berlin.
Associated links:
www.book-fair.com | www.adbookfair.com | www.publishingperspectives.com
Description: http://admin/gbo/images/frank.jpg
Description: http://admin/gbo/images/auswartiges.jpg
Click here if you do not wish to receive this communication
Posted 11 minutes ago by Nksagar
Sep
19
To:
“Naresh Sagar”
Obama – Biden
Naresh –
People who meet the President sometimes do crazy things — like this…
And you could be one of the next people to meet him.
Hug
Imagine sitting down to DINNER with him!
Donate $5 or whatever you can to be automatically entered for that chance:
https://donate.barackobama.com/Dinner
Good luck,
Obama for America
P.S. — If that didn’t sound good enough, the campaign will even fly you out — with a friend! Enter now.
Posted 14 minutes ago by Nksagar
Sep
19
AIRASIA X WINS 2012 BEST NEW ROUTE LAUNCH AT THE BUDGIE$ & TRAVEL AWARDS
SEPANG, 19 SEPTEMBER 2012 – AirAsia X, the long-haul low cost carrier of the AirAsia Group, was awarded the Best New Route Launch- Haneda at the 2012 Budgie$ & Travel Awards held in Sofitel, London last night.
AirAsia X was given the recognition based on evidence of excellent profitability of new route and unique and innovative approach to partnerships and negotiations. The other finalists in the category include easyJet- Luton Kelflavik, Southwest – Atlanta, SpiceJet- Delhi and VietJet Air- Ho Chi Minh City/Hanoi.
The Budgie$ & Travel Awards celebrates the leadership, efforts, accomplishments and the ingenuity of the low cost aviation industry and the Asian travel industry. The annual event is a night to honour the industry’s innovators, forward thinkers and revolutionaries.
Azran Osman-Rani, CEO of AirAsia X said, “We are truly honoured with this recognition. Haneda is a big breakthrough for the Low Cost Carrier model, showing that it is not always about lowest cost airports in inconvenient secondary locations. We are still able to deliver the world’s lowest unit cost low cost carrier model, while offering convenient airports, and more importantly, catalyzing the awakening of the low cost carrier market in Japan. Thank you Terrapin and the Judges”
Posted 18 minutes ago by Nksagar
Sep
19
Mobile VoIP software creator REVE Systems in Red Herring’s 2012
Mobile VoIP software creator REVE Systems in Red Herring’s 2012 Top 100 Asia list
New Delhi September 19, 2012
REVE Systems, the Singapore headquartered leading VoIP solution provider with its innovative technology platform, has been admitted to the prestigious list of 2012 Red Herring’s Top 100 Asia Award in Hong Kong.
Red Herring Top 100 award recognises leading private companies from Asia, celebrating these startups’ innovations and technologies across their respective industries.
Red Herring’s Top 100 Asia list has become a mark of distinction for identifying promising new companies and entrepreneurs. Red Herring editors were among the first to recognize that companies such as Facebook, Twitter, Google, Yahoo, Skype, Salesforce.com, YouTube, and eBay would change the way we live and work.
“Choosing the companies with the strongest potential was by no means a small feat,” said Alex Vieux, publisher and CEO of Red Herring. “After rigorous contemplation and discussion, we narrowed our list down from hundreds of candidates from across Asia to the Top 100 Winners. We believe REVE Systems embodies the vision, drive and innovation that define a successful entrepreneurial venture. REVE Systems should be proud of its accomplishment, as the competition was the strongest it has ever been.”
Red Herring’s editorial staff evaluated the companies on both quantitative and qualitative criteria, such as financial performance, technology innovation, management quality, strategy, and market penetration. This assessment of potential is complemented by a review of the track record and standing of startups relative to their peers, allowing Red Herring to see past the “buzz” and make the list a valuable instrument of discovery and advocacy for the most promising new business models in Asia.
On receiving this award, REVE Systems CEO Mr. M Rezaul Hassan said, “We are happy to receive the prestigious 2012 Red Herring’s Top 100 Asia Award. The award recognizes technology prowess of Reve’s development team serving 1700 service providers in over 70 countries in the IP communication Industry.”
REVE Systems, a Singapore headquartered, VoIP solution provider offers a complete range of Mobile VoIP platform, Softswitch-Billing and other software applications. Currently, the company is serving 1700 service providers across 70 countries. REVE Systems headquartered in Singapore and has its development center in Bangladesh and India and Sales and Support offices in the UK and USA.
Red Herring is an international media organization which recognizes young companies and startup’s technology innovations around the world. The Red Herring’s Top 100 Asia Award is part of a world series where they look at companies from Asia, America’s and Europe, and the winners have a chance to compete in the Global Top 100 List.
No comments:
Post a Comment